Vehicle Value Loss After a Traffic Accident in Turkey: Değer Kaybı Claim, Expert Appointment and Foreign Owners
Vehicle Value Loss After a Traffic: Vehicle value loss claim after a Turkish traffic accident: eligibility, compulsory insurer, SBM expert appointment, evidence and foreign vehicle owners.
Vehicle value loss (araç değer kaybı) is the reduction in a vehicle’s market value caused by its accident and repair history, separate from the physical repair cost. In Türkiye, a qualifying owner who is not legally responsible for the relevant share of accident damage can pursue value loss within the compulsory motor liability framework, subject to current statutory/policy conditions and exclusions. SBM operates an online value-loss expert appointment system. Foreign ownership or residence abroad does not by itself eliminate a Turkish value-loss claim where the accident and insurance framework create Turkish entitlement.

1. Repair cost and value loss are different
Repair restores damaged parts. Market value can still fall because buyers discount a vehicle with accident/repair history.
A claimant should calculate each head separately.
Payment of repair invoice does not automatically settle value loss unless a valid release covers it.
2. Fault share affects entitlement
The claimant generally seeks the portion corresponding to the other side’s legal responsibility.
If the vehicle owner/driver is fully at fault, there is ordinarily no third-party compulsory insurer from whom to recover the owner’s own value loss.
Disputed fault should be challenged promptly.
3. The responsible compulsory insurer is a primary claim target
The insurer responds within compulsory motor insurance law and policy limits.
The vehicle operator/driver can remain legally relevant for uninsured or excess amounts depending on the case.
Identify the policy valid on the accident date.
4. SBM provides a value-loss expert appointment system
SBM’s current online guide allows rights holders to appoint an expert for traffic value-loss claims through the specified digital process.
The expert evaluates vehicle data, repair history and market factors.
The expert report is evidence; parties can still dispute methodology where legally justified.
5. Total-loss/scrap vehicles are excluded from compulsory value-loss cover
SBM notes the Road Traffic Law exclusion for vehicles withdrawn from traffic or scrapped because of the damage.
A total-loss claim is economically different because the vehicle is not repaired and returned to the market in the same way.
Do not claim both inconsistent total-loss and repair-based value loss.
6. Prior accidents matter
A vehicle with earlier damage to the same area can have less new value loss from the later accident.
Tramer/SBM history and repair invoices should be reviewed.
Hiding prior damage can undermine the claim.
7. Mileage and age affect market impact
Newer, lower-mileage vehicles often experience greater market discount after a serious repair, but there is no universal percentage.
The expert should use current market evidence.
Luxury/imported models can require specialist valuation.
8. Structural repairs are especially significant
Chassis, pillars, airbag systems and major panels can affect buyer perception more than minor cosmetic repair.
Repair photographs and parts list matter.
Paint-only damage should not be valued as structural loss.
9. A foreign-registered vehicle can require special market evidence
If the damaged car is registered and normally sold abroad, the relevant market-value loss can require evidence from that home market and international insurance analysis.
Green Card/frontier insurance can affect the responding insurer.
Foreign valuation documents should be translated where used in Turkish proceedings.
10. Rental vehicles involve owner and renter separately
The rental company normally owns the vehicle and therefore holds the property/value-loss right.
A renter charged a “value loss” amount by the rental company should demand proof of the actual legal/economic loss and contract basis.
The renter should not pay a fictional value-loss charge merely because the deposit is available.
11. The insurer claim should include all core documents
Accident report, fault, registration, policy, repair/parts records, photographs, expert/valuation material and bank information should be supplied.
A complete file reduces repeated deficiency requests.
Preserve proof of submission.
12. ALO193 can support unified claims notification
From 1 September 2026, SBM’s ALO193/OHİM provides a common traffic/kasko claim notification and tracking channel.
This is operationally useful but does not replace legal proof of value loss.
Keep the claim reference.
13. Insurer rejection should identify the reason
Possible reasons include fault, exclusion, prior damage, total-loss status, lack of covered loss or documentation.
Obtain the written calculation/rejection.
Challenge the actual reason rather than submitting the same documents repeatedly.
14. Insurance arbitration can be available
Where statutory conditions exist, the Insurance Arbitration Commission provides a specialist dispute route.
Current monetary thresholds and appeal mechanisms should be checked at filing.
Expert evidence remains important.
15. Court proceedings remain possible where appropriate
The appropriate court/claim depends on parties and insurance relationship.
Prior insurer application requirements should be complied with.
Litigation cost should be compared with the amount realistically in dispute.
16. Interest start can depend on demand and defendant
Do not use one universal interest date for insurer, operator and driver without legal analysis.
Written insurer application and default records are important.
Claim currency also matters for foreign owners.
17. Value loss should be claimed before evidence becomes stale
Later sale, additional accidents and new repairs can make valuation more difficult.
Obtain repair and market evidence soon after completion.
Limitation periods should be analysed promptly.
18. Settlement should identify whether value loss is included
A payment labelled “all material damages” can create later disputes about scope.
Read releases carefully.
Separate repair, replacement car/loss of use and value loss where possible.
Conclusion
Turkish vehicle value-loss claims are valuation and insurance cases. Fault, prior accident history, repair severity and current market evidence should be documented separately from the physical repair claim.
FAQ
Is value loss the same as repair cost? No.
Can foreigners claim? Nationality alone does not bar a qualifying Turkish accident claim.
Can I appoint an expert online? SBM provides a value-loss expert appointment route.
Does prior damage matter? Yes.
Can a total-loss vehicle claim value loss? SBM notes the statutory exclusion for specified withdrawn/scrapped vehicles.
Can rental company charge renter? It must have a valid contractual and actual loss basis.
Can insurance arbitration be used? Potentially.
Should I keep repair photos? Yes.
Does ALO193 calculate the claim? It is a notification/tracking channel, not a final judicial valuation.
Can I claim after selling the car? Evidence and standing require analysis; claim promptly.
Official source
SBM Value Loss Expert Appointment Guide
Reviewed 8 September 2026.
Bakırcı & Keskin Law Office – Mersin
İhsaniye Mahallesi, 4903. Sokak, Profit İş Merkezi No:23, Floor 3, Office 14, 33070 Akdeniz/Mersin, Türkiye. The firm’s only physical office is in Mersin.
Contact regarding a legal matter
In your first message, you may briefly state the subject, your country or city, and any relevant notification or recent procedural date. Please do not send identity numbers, medical data, or personal documents. Messaging alone does not constitute legal advice or create a lawyer–client relationship.