Sea Cargo Damage Notice in Turkey: Three-Day Reservations, Delay Claims and Joint Surveys
The deadline for notifying sea-cargo damage is not the same as the deadline for bringing proceedings. Article 1185 of the Turkish Commercial Code distinguishes apparent loss or damage, non-apparent loss or damage, and late delivery. It also gives different consequences to missing the relevant notice: loss-and-damage presumptions are rebuttable, whereas compensation is not paid for delay damage which was not notified within the statutory period. A survey appointment or an insurer notification should not be assumed to satisfy every one of those requirements.
Have a general question about this article? Ask anonymously
This guide is for overseas cargo interests handling a Turkey-linked delivery, including shipments through Mersin and Istanbul. It explains Turkish Commercial Code No. 6102, Articles 1184–1185, with the separate proceedings rule in Article 1188 identified where necessary. The applicable law and the client’s right to bring the claim must be established from the actual carriage documents. The Turkish statutory text controls over this English explanation.
1. Identify the delivery event and the kind of complaint
Before calculating a notice period, identify the event treated as delivery to the consignee and the complaint being made. Vessel arrival, discharge, terminal movement, customs release and receipt by the consignee are not descriptions which should be substituted for one another without examining the facts. Keep the actual handover records and the relevant times.
Next distinguish a physical shortage or damaged condition from a financial loss caused by late delivery. A shipment can give rise to both, but they engage different notice rules. A general message saying that “there is a problem with the shipment” may not explain which complaint is being notified or what the observed loss consists of.
Record what was externally apparent at delivery and what was discovered only after opening or examination. Preserve photographs, packaging, seal information and the first inspection record. Do not alter the discovery chronology to fit a preferred deadline; the distinction between apparent and non-apparent loss must be supported by the actual condition and events.
2. Apparent loss or damage must be notified by delivery
Article 1185(1) requires written notification of loss or damage to the carrier no later than delivery of the goods to the consignee. Where the shortage or damaged condition is apparent, waiting for a later commercial invoice or a final repair quotation is not the statutory approach. The initial notice concerns the loss or damage, not a requirement to have completed every part of the financial claim.
The notice must state generally what the loss or damage consists of. Identify the shipment and describe the observed discrepancy. The description should be concrete enough to connect the reservation to the goods, while distinguishing observations from conclusions which still require expert assessment.
A clean receipt issued without any accompanying reservation becomes part of the evidential record. Before signing, ensure the person receiving the cargo records the actual condition and communicates the relevant written notice through an appropriate channel. An operational handover form should not be assumed to constitute a separate, adequate notice to the carrier merely because it contains a signature.
3. Non-apparent loss or damage has a three-day dispatch rule
Where loss or damage is not externally apparent, Article 1185(1) provides that sending the notice within three days, calculated continuously from delivery to the consignee, is sufficient. The statutory wording is not “three working days.” It also does not state that the period begins whenever the consignee later decides to open the package.
Preserve proof of dispatch as well as the notice and attachments. The rule’s reference to sending the notice is important, but it does not justify using an unidentified recipient or an untraceable communication. The notice must be directed to the relevant carrier or a person whose receipt has the effect recognised by the statute.
Do not wait for a complete expert report where the loss has already become apparent within that short period. The initial written description can identify the observed problem and the need for examination without inventing a final cause or valuation. Supplementary evidence can then be organised while the separate proceedings deadline is monitored.
4. Delay damage has a separate sixty-day notice requirement
Article 1185(5) requires the consignee to notify the carrier in writing of delay within sixty days, calculated continuously from delivery to the consignee. The paragraph expressly states that compensation is not paid for delay damage which was not notified in time. That consequence is different from the rebuttable presumptions applicable to unnotified physical loss or damage.
The sixty-day period is not an extension of the three-day period for non-apparent damage. Where the goods are both late and physically damaged, identify and preserve each complaint under its own rule. A delayed delivery does not convert a physical-damage reservation into a delay-only issue.
Keep the agreed delivery information and the actual delivery record with the notice. The notice requirement is separate from proving that there was legally relevant delay and that the delay caused the financial loss claimed. A timely notice preserves the relevant position; it does not establish every element of compensation by itself.
5. Joint examination can remove the need for a separate notice in defined circumstances
Article 1185(2) dispenses with notice where examination of the goods was carried out with the parties’ participation by a court, competent authority or experts officially appointed for that purpose. The requirements concerning participation and the examining body or expert are part of the exception.
A unilateral private survey commissioned by a cargo insurer should not automatically be treated as satisfying that statutory exception. Examine who appointed the surveyor, who participated and what examination actually occurred. The existence of a report bearing the word “survey” does not answer those questions.
Even where an examination is being arranged, preserve the ability to give timely written notice rather than assuming the exception will later be accepted. Keep invitations, attendance records, the appointment basis and the resulting report. Those records explain whether the statutory conditions were satisfied and what facts the examination established.
6. Article 1184 provides for examination before receipt
Before the consignee takes delivery, Article 1184 permits the carrier, master or consignee to have the goods examined by a court, other competent authorities or experts authorised for the purpose to establish their condition, measurement, number or weight. The other party should be present so far as possible. This is a specific evidential mechanism, not merely a commercial discussion about whether a survey would be convenient.
The applicant initially bears the examination costs. Where the consignee applies and the examination establishes loss or damage for which the carrier must compensate, Article 1184(2) places those costs on the carrier. The rule does not mean that every private investigation cost is automatically recoverable regardless of outcome or legal basis.
Identify what the examination needs to establish. A package count, weight discrepancy and internal deterioration can require different observations. The instructions should be precise enough to preserve the relevant evidence without asking the examiner to assume the legal responsibility which the investigation is intended to help assess.
7. The parties must facilitate examination and counting
Article 1185(3) requires the carrier and consignee, where actual or suspected loss or damage exists, to give each other all appropriate assistance for examining the goods and establishing the package count. This supports a practical, documented inspection process rather than an avoidable dispute over access.
Record requests for access, proposed examination times, the cargo location and any refusal or condition imposed. Preserve the packaging and relevant records where doing so is lawful and safe. Necessary safety, customs or authority directions must still be respected; the notice rule is not permission to interfere with controlled cargo.
Distinguish a party’s refusal to participate from a failure to invite it. A complete chronology should show the opportunity offered and the response. That factual distinction can matter both to the evidential value of the resulting report and to an argument that the statutory joint-examination exception applies.
8. Missing a damage notice does not create the same consequence as missing a delay notice
Article 1185(4) addresses loss or damage which was neither notified nor established through the relevant examination. It creates a presumption that the carrier delivered the goods as described in the sea-carriage document. Where loss or damage is nevertheless established, it also creates a presumption that the loss arose from a cause for which the carrier is not responsible. The provision expressly permits contrary proof.
It is therefore inaccurate to say that every physical-damage claim automatically disappears when the three-day notice was missed. The evidential position becomes more difficult, and the claimant must address the presumptions with appropriate proof. That is different from guaranteeing recovery despite the omission.
Preserve the available loading, custody and delivery evidence promptly. The bill-of-lading evidence guide explains the separate role of cargo descriptions and reservations. A claim assessment must consider both the transport document and the effect of the notice or examination record.
9. Send the notice to a legally relevant recipient
Article 1185(6) provides that, where the goods were delivered by an actual carrier, notice to that actual carrier has the same effect as notice to the contracting carrier, and vice versa. It also treats notice to a person acting in the name and on behalf of the carrier or actual carrier, including the master and responsible ship’s officer, as notice to the relevant carrier.
This does not make every terminal employee, independent forwarder or customer-service intermediary an authorised recipient in every case. Identify the recipient’s capacity and retain the communications establishing it. Sending a complaint to the seller alone is not a substitute for examining the carrier-notice requirement.
The guide to carrier identity and actual carriers assists with that separate party analysis. Keep the full legal entity name, relevant address and the basis on which a representative receives the notice in the claim file.
10. A useful notice identifies the issue without inventing a finished claim
The written record should identify the transport document, vessel or voyage, cargo references, delivery event and the general nature of the loss or damage. For delay, identify the late-delivery complaint distinctly. State the sender’s capacity and provide a contact for examination arrangements.
Attach or preserve the first available supporting records, but distinguish them from a final expert conclusion. A notice can describe torn packaging, a missing package count or observed moisture without asserting an unverified technical cause. The objective is an accurate, timely reservation, not an exaggerated accusation.
Choose a communication method appropriate to the legal and evidential requirements of the case, and retain proof of sending and receipt where available. This guide does not declare that every ordinary email, messaging-app note or unsigned form satisfies every form requirement. The channel, recipient and record need to be assessed together.
| Action | Purpose | What it does not automatically replace |
|---|---|---|
| Written carrier notice | Record the complaint under Article 1185 | Proceedings under Article 1188 |
| Inspection or survey | Establish condition, count, weight or cause | Notice, unless the statutory exception applies |
| Insurance notification | Address the insurance relationship | Notice to the relevant carrier |
| Document preservation | Retain evidence of the shipment and loss | A required procedural filing |
| Financial claim schedule | Explain the amount sought | Proof of responsibility and causation |
11. Track the proceedings deadline independently
Article 1188 contains a separate one-year rule for bringing claims against the carrier for cargo loss, damage or late delivery through judicial proceedings. Its starting points and special provisions require their own assessment. A timely Article 1185 notice should not be described as giving the claimant unlimited time to sue.
Keep a deadline record which separately identifies delivery, the notice period, any examination and the applicable proceedings deadline. Settlement discussions, requests for documents and insurer handling should not be assumed to suspend every legal period. Obtain a case-specific assessment before relying on an extension or exception.
Where applicable law is disputed, the MÖHUK Article 29 carriage-law guide addresses the conflicts enquiry. This article explains the Turkish statutory notice framework where it applies; it is not a universal notice schedule for all international transport regimes.
12. Coordinating a claim from abroad
An overseas cargo owner should arrange for the person taking delivery to record the condition and preserve the relevant notices immediately. The legal file should include the full bill, delivery and survey records, notices, dispatch evidence and the current cargo location. Provide the chronology with dates and time zones clearly identified.
Bakırcı & Keskin Law Office is Mersin-based and works throughout Türkiye with an Istanbul and Mersin focus. Initial enquiries should identify the Turkish connection and any imminent date without disclosing sensitive commercial documents publicly. A confidential document channel can be arranged after the initial outline.
Frequently asked questions
When must apparent sea-cargo damage be notified?
Article 1185(1) requires written notice to the carrier no later than delivery to the consignee. The notice must generally identify what the loss or damage consists of.
Are the three days for hidden damage working days?
The statute specifies three days calculated continuously from delivery. It does not describe the period as three working days.
Must a final expert report accompany the first notice?
Article 1185(1) requires a general statement of the nature of the loss or damage. Do not delay the notice merely to complete a final valuation or technical report.
Does missing a damage notice automatically extinguish the claim?
Article 1185(4) creates rebuttable presumptions where loss or damage was neither notified nor established. The claim’s evidential position must be assessed; automatic extinction is not that paragraph’s rule.
What is different about delay notice?
Article 1185(5) requires written notice within sixty continuous days from delivery and states that compensation is not paid for delay damage not notified in time.
Does an insurer’s private survey always remove the notice requirement?
No. Article 1185(2) specifies examination with the parties’ participation by a court, competent authority or officially appointed experts. The actual appointment and participation must be checked.
Who initially pays for an Article 1184 examination?
The applicant initially bears the cost. Where the consignee applies and compensable carrier-responsibility loss or damage is established, paragraph 2 allocates the examination cost to the carrier.
Can notice to the actual carrier count as notice to the contracting carrier?
Yes, where the goods were delivered by the actual carrier, Article 1185(6) gives the reciprocal effect specified there. The recipient’s identity and role must be established.
Does the sixty-day delay rule extend the hidden-damage notice period?
No. Physical loss or damage and delay are governed by separate notice provisions. Preserve each complaint under its own rule.
Does sending notice replace bringing proceedings?
No. Article 1188’s proceedings rule is separate. Notice, survey, insurance handling and litigation steps must be tracked independently.
Primary legal sources
Ministry of Justice legislation database: Turkish Commercial Code No. 6102, Articles 1184–1185 and 1188; the Ministry also hosts a statutory text reproduction. Use the legislation record for amendment checks rather than treating the hosted reproduction as a separately certified 2026 consolidation.
Ask about a sea-cargo notice or survey
State the delivery date, whether the problem was apparent and what notice has already been sent. Do not wait for an enquiry response to preserve an imminent legal deadline.
Istanbul and Mersin offices
Mersin-based legal work throughout Türkiye, with an Istanbul and Mersin focus.
Istanbul — Polaris Plaza
Maslak Ahi Evran Caddesi, Polaris Plaza No:21, Floor 9, 34475 Sarıyer/İstanbul. Istanbul office directions.
Mersin — Profit İş Merkezi
İhsaniye Mahallesi, 4903. Sokak, Profit İş Merkezi No:23, Floor 3, Office 14, 33070 Akdeniz/Mersin. Mersin office directions.
Call +90 552 224 43 66. An enquiry does not establish representation or suspend a legal deadline.
Contact regarding a legal matter
In your first message, you may briefly state the subject, your country or city, and any relevant notification or recent procedural date. Please do not send identity numbers, medical data, or personal documents. Messaging alone does not constitute legal advice or create a lawyer–client relationship.
Discover more from Bakırcı & Keskin Hukuk Bürosu
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.