Court Costs in Turkey: Fees, Expense Advances and Recoverable Litigation Expenses

What does a Turkish civil litigation budget include?

Court costs in Turkey should be divided into official fees, expense advances, specific evidence costs and professional fees before a case is started. A single amount described as the court deposit does not explain what is being paid, who receives it or whether it can later be returned. Articles 120 and 323–333 of the Code of Civil Procedure provide important distinctions for civil proceedings.

Have a general question about this article? Ask anonymously

The person who initially finances a step is not necessarily the person on whom the court ultimately places the cost. Conversely, winning a claim does not mean that every private expenditure will automatically be reimbursed in full. Identify the case, proposed evidence, number and location of parties and likely procedural stages before preparing a budget.

This guide does not quote an all-inclusive price or guarantee a recovery. The applicable tariffs and the actual court directions must be checked when payment is required. Our English legal services homepage explains representation from physical offices in Istanbul and Mersin for matters connected with other Turkish cities.

At a glance

1. Separate the fee from the money advanced for future steps

A court fee and an expense advance serve different functions. Filing and judgment-related charges arise under the applicable fees framework, while an advance finances procedural expenses such as notifications and other necessary steps. The fact that both amounts are paid around the filing date does not make them one legal category.

Obtain a breakdown identifying the amount, purpose and receiving authority. Check whether the calculation concerns a fixed charge or a value-related proceeding, without assuming that every civil case uses the same method. A calculation for a monetary claim should not be copied into a different non-monetary application merely because the parties are the same.

Preserve the official receipt and the reference connecting it to the file. Payment to an intermediary is not automatically payment into the court account. For overseas transfers, identify any conversion or bank deduction separately so a net shortfall does not remain hidden until a deadline expires.

2. Read an order to complete the general expense advance

Article 120 requires the claimant to lodge the applicable litigation fees and the prescribed expense advance when filing. If the advance proves insufficient during proceedings, the court gives the specified two-week peremptory period to complete it. Obtain the actual direction and notification instead of acting on an approximate message about a small administrative balance.

The 2020 amendment expressly reserves the separate Article 324 regime for evidence advances. This distinction prevents every request for an expert payment being automatically treated as the same issue as the initial general advance. Classification matters because the consequences of non-payment can differ.

Where a direction is unclear, identify the amount, purpose and legal basis requiring explanation. Do not assume that asking the registry a question suspends the period. Counsel must assess the order and the appropriate response while preserving evidence of any payment already made or discrepancy in the court account.

3. Treat the advance for a particular item of evidence separately

Article 324 requires a party requesting evidence to pay the advance fixed by the court within the peremptory period. Where both parties request the same evidence, the provision addresses sharing the advance equally. Record the evidence concerned rather than describing the payment as an undefined additional case fee.

If a party does not fulfil that obligation, the other party can supply the advance. Otherwise the requesting party is treated as having abandoned introduction of that evidence within the statutory framework. That is not identical to an automatic decision that every aspect of the entire claim is false or that the action must always be dismissed procedurally.

The Code preserves special rules for matters outside the parties’ power of disposition. Article 325 also has a specific mechanism for court-initiated evidence in those matters. Do not use the ordinary party-requested rule to describe every family or public-interest proceeding without checking its legal setting.

4. Define the expert or inspection task before forecasting its cost

A technical examination depends on what the court needs assessed. A paper calculation, an on-site building inspection and a multidisciplinary machinery examination are different assignments. Obtain the appointment or proposed task and identify travel, access, sampling and document requirements. The number of pages in the claim alone does not determine the cost.

Distinguish an appointed expert’s court-regulated payment from the fee of a private consultant instructed by a party. They can serve different evidential roles and follow different payment arrangements. A private invoice does not become an officially ordered litigation expense merely because it uses the phrase expert report.

Keep the decision, advance receipt and resulting work together. Where a further or supplementary report is needed, assess its basis and any new direction rather than assuming the first payment covered unlimited examinations. The expert report guide explains the separate questions about omissions, objections and supplementary work.

5. Budget service, translations and attendance from the actual file

The residence and number of parties affect service planning. A domestic notification and a document transmitted abroad can require different preparation and expenditure. Establish the relevant addresses and available service information early rather than repeatedly paying for notices sent to an address known to be obsolete.

Translate the documents needed for the selected procedural step while preserving the originals. Do not order indiscriminate authentication of every email in a commercial archive. Public certificates, powers of attorney and ordinary correspondence have different document-preparation questions, as explained in the translation and authentication guide.

Attendance expenditure also needs a legal and practical basis. An overseas client’s decision to fly to every hearing is not an assurance that every airfare will be shifted to the opponent. Identify whether personal attendance was required, what the Code permits the court to assess and what belongs to the client’s private choice or agreed representation budget.

6. Understand the starting rule for final allocation of costs

Article 326 generally places litigation expenses on the party against whom judgment is given, subject to statutory exceptions. Where each side succeeds in part, allocation follows the relevant proportion of success. More than one unsuccessful party can also require a decision about sharing or joint responsibility under the provision.

The result should be applied to the actual claims, not estimated from a headline impression that one side mostly won. A claimant can succeed on principal but fail on another contested head, while a counterclaim produces a separate result. Keep a claim-and-outcome schedule so the costs calculation can be understood.

Article 332 requires the court to address litigation costs and state the amounts, allocation and breakdown in the judgment. Compare the operative decision with the account rather than assuming that every receipt in the client’s folder was automatically allowed. Any alleged omission or error needs an appropriate procedural assessment.

For a simplified illustration, assume an ordinary divisible monetary claim of TRY 100,000 succeeds for TRY 60,000 and the relevant shared expense account is TRY 10,000. A straightforward sixty-to-forty allocation of that particular account produces TRY 6,000 and TRY 4,000. This arithmetic does not establish the treatment of every fee, awarded lawyer fee, counterclaim or exceptional expense in a real case. Identify which account is being allocated before using the ratio. An unsuccessful interest claim or a different procedural outcome may require a more specific analysis than applying one percentage to every payment.

7. Do not assume that success excuses avoidable expense

Article 327 addresses unnecessary prolongation or expenditure and allows a costs consequence even against a party otherwise successful, within its terms. Procedural conduct therefore matters separately from the substantive result. The rule is not permission to allege misconduct whenever the opponent disputes a genuine issue.

Identify the act said to have caused an unnecessary cost, the resulting expense and the evidence connecting them. An adjournment caused by missing documents can raise different questions from an adjournment required for a legitimate technical investigation. Avoid presenting every delay as abusive without examining its cause.

Article 329 separately addresses bad-faith or unfounded litigation and its specified consequences. Do not turn that exceptional framework into a universal promise that the opponent will pay the client’s entire private lawyer bill. The conditions and the court’s assessment remain necessary; a successful outcome alone does not establish all of them.

8. Keep the awarded lawyer fee distinct from the private engagement fee

Article 330 concerns the lawyer fee awarded in favour of the represented party under the applicable legal framework. The relationship between that award and the lawyer’s entitlement must also be read with Article 164 of the Lawyers Act. It should not be described simply as a refund of whatever private professional fee the client negotiated.

The engagement agreement should explain the work included, the charging basis and how any awarded fee is treated consistently with the governing rules. Initial review, litigation, appeal and enforcement can be different stages. A payment for one defined task should not be represented as purchasing unlimited future services unless the agreement actually provides that scope.

Ask for a clear reconciliation when money is recovered. Principal, interest, awarded costs, the awarded lawyer fee and amounts payable under the engagement should be identifiable. This prevents the client from confusing the gross sum in a court judgment with the amount ultimately available after the applicable legal and contractual account is settled.

9. Deal expressly with costs when the case settles or loses its subject

A settlement amount does not automatically determine who bears every expense already incurred. Identify court charges, advances, expert work and professional-fee arrangements in the negotiation. A clause saying each party bears its own costs must be considered alongside the actual governing rules and the rights of anyone not party to that agreement.

Article 331 addresses a case that no longer requires a merits decision because it has lost its subject, looking to the parties’ position when the action was brought. Payment after filing therefore does not automatically mean that costs disappear or must all remain with the claimant. Preserve the chronology of demand, filing and subsequent performance.

Withdrawal and waiver can produce other consequences. The withdrawal and waiver guide explains those case-ending choices. Read the actual closure decision and the costs it addresses rather than assuming that a payment agreement settles every procedural expense.

Where the final decision appears silent about an expense the court was required to address, preserve the operative judgment and service record. Completion of an omitted ruling, correction of arithmetic and an appeal against a substantive costs decision are different routes. The judgment-correction guide explains the distinction. The appropriate step depends on the actual defect and its deadline, not merely the client’s belief that the bill should have been allowed.

10. Reconcile unused advances and confirm the return

Article 333 provides for the court, after the judgment becomes final, to order return of the unused portion of the advance on its own initiative. The notification expense for that decision is met from the amount to be returned. An initial deposit is therefore not necessarily money permanently spent, but its unused balance must be identified correctly.

For an illustrative account, suppose TRY 10,000 was advanced and the verified court account shows TRY 6,000 used. The starting unused balance is TRY 4,000, before any applicable further expenditure such as the notification identified in Article 333. These invented figures are not a tariff or a promise about the balance in an actual file.

Keep the original receipt, transaction history, finality information and return order together. Confirm the receiving account and actual credit before reporting repayment as complete. A statement that the file has closed does not itself prove that the money reached the client or explain whether another authorised account received it.

11. Distinguish security and legal aid from ordinary costs

A security order can protect expenses or potential loss without being an ordinary fee. The security for costs guide explains claimant-status questions and reciprocity. Exemption from one security requirement does not automatically eliminate court fees or every evidence advance.

Legal aid is a separate procedure with eligibility, scope and documentary conditions. A party unable to finance a direction should obtain advice promptly rather than assume an informal statement of hardship suspends the obligation. An application and an order granting particular assistance are different events.

Keep the categories visible in the budget. A returnable security, an unused procedural advance, an incurred expert cost and a private fee should not be combined into one purported refund. Each has its own supporting document and conditions for payment, allocation or release.

12. Maintain a staged budget for a client living abroad

Prepare a ledger showing the date, case reference, amount, currency, purpose, recipient and receipt for each payment. Distinguish an estimate, a court-ordered amount and an amount actually paid. Update the budget when a new procedural stage or technical assignment arises rather than silently replacing the initial estimate with an unexplained total.

For remittances from abroad, separate currency conversion and bank charges from the legal cost itself. The person handling funds should be clearly authorised. Never send online-banking passwords to arrange a court payment, and verify changes to receiving details through an established communication channel.

Bakırcı & Keskin Law Office has physical offices in Istanbul and Mersin. Civil proceedings in other Turkish cities are coordinated from our Istanbul and Mersin offices under the competent procedure and agreed mandate. English reporting should state what was budgeted, ordered, paid, awarded and returned. None of those stages should be described as another, and no total litigation cost or recovery is guaranteed before the file is examined.

Frequently asked questions

Are all court payments non-refundable?

No. Fees, incurred expenses, unused advances and security have different legal treatment.

Is an expert advance the same as the initial expense advance?

Article 120 reserves the separate Article 324 framework for evidence advances. Identify the actual order and purpose.

Does failure to fund one item of evidence always end the whole lawsuit?

The Article 324 consequence concerns that evidence within its framework. Other requirements and special rules need separate assessment.

Will winning reimburse every private expense?

No. The applicable allocation and recoverability rules, the judgment and any exceptions must be examined.

Is the awarded lawyer fee identical to my private fee?

No. The court award and the professional engagement are distinct and must be reconciled under the governing rules.

Does payment after filing erase the costs issue?

No. Article 331 requires assessment of the relevant initial position where the dispute loses its subject.

When is an unused advance returned?

Article 333 addresses return after finality. Confirm the court account, order and actual payment.

Does sending an enquiry suspend a payment deadline?

No. Representation, any application and compliance with the actual court direction must be addressed separately.

Official legal sources

Code of Civil Procedure No. 6100; TBMM enacted text: Articles 120 and 323–333; Law No. 7251: amendments to Articles 120, 323 and 331; Lawyers Act No. 1136: official legislation service; Ministry of Justice tariff publication and official links.

Parliamentary enacted texts must be read with relevant amendments. Tariffs and ordered amounts must be checked when payment is required. This is general English-language information, not an official translation or a fee quotation.