Your Rented Apartment in Turkey Is Unusable: Repair, Rent Reduction and Defect Remedies

Short answer: Article 301 requires a Turkish landlord to provide and maintain premises suitable for the agreed use. Articles 304–308 regulate defect remedies, including repair, proportionate rent reduction, compensation and termination where the statutory conditions are met. Notify the landlord promptly and preserve the condition and knowledge dates. A defect does not automatically justify withholding all rent, and repair access, financial adjustment and termination are separate legal steps.

Have a general question about this article? Ask anonymously

Identify the agreed use and the defect that prevents it

A tenant’s contractual remedy begins with the use promised by the lease. Establish which premises were let, the agreed residential use, the delivery date and the condition actually provided. A defect must be described in terms of its effect on that use. A general complaint that the apartment is disappointing does not identify whether the problem concerns an essential facility, a repairable fault, an agreed feature or a different contractual issue.

Code of Obligations Article 301 requires the landlord to deliver the premises on the agreed date in a condition suitable for the intended contractual use and maintain that condition during the lease. In residential and roofed-workplace leases, the rule cannot be changed to the tenant’s detriment. A broad clause purporting to remove every maintenance obligation must therefore be assessed against that mandatory rule.

Retain the lease, agreed inventory, delivery record and communications identifying the promised condition. Record the actual malfunction and the rooms or facilities affected. A technical assessment may be necessary to establish cause, severity and suitable repair. Legal classification should follow those facts; a photograph alone does not establish every structural or safety conclusion attributed to it.

A defect present at delivery and one arising later have related but distinct rules

Article 304 distinguishes delivery with significant defects from delivery with less serious defects. For significant defects at delivery, it allows the tenant to rely on the debtor-default provisions or the landlord’s rules for defects arising later. For less serious delivery defects, it refers to the latter defect-liability rules. The delivery chronology and severity therefore matter before selecting the remedy.

Identify when the condition first existed, when it was discovered and what the tenant and landlord knew at handover. Preserve any reservation in the delivery record and subsequent notice. A later repair attempt should not erase the evidence of the initial condition. Equally, the tenant should not present an issue arising after months of use as a proved delivery defect without evidence connecting it to that earlier date.

Article 305 provides remedies where the premises later become defective: repair, a reduction proportionate to the defect and compensation, with termination reserved for a significant defect. The choice must match the actual problem and legal conditions. The provision expressly allows a damages claim alongside the other elective remedies; it does not make every claimed item of expenditure automatically recoverable.

Notify the landlord promptly and preserve the knowledge date

Article 318 requires the tenant to notify the landlord without delay of defects the tenant is not responsible for remedying and imposes liability for loss caused by failure to do so. The notice should identify the defect, its location, observed effect and when it appeared. Supply useful supporting material and a way to arrange lawful access. An unclear message saying only that the apartment is bad may not convey what needs investigation.

The landlord’s knowledge also matters under Article 307, which connects rent reduction to the period from the landlord learning of the use-affecting defect until it is remedied. Preserve the complete notice and evidence of receipt or other established knowledge. The relevant record may include earlier reports to the landlord, but the legal effect of communications to an intermediary depends on that person’s role and authority.

Update the notice when the condition materially changes or a repair fails. Identify what was attempted and what remains defective. Do not replace the original chronology with a later summary that loses the first notification date. A clear record allows the parties and court to assess both the landlord’s opportunity to act and the period for which the tenant claims reduced use.

Article 306 gives repair a defined sequence

Under Article 306, the tenant can require the landlord to remedy the defect within an appropriate period. If it is not remedied within that period, the tenant can arrange repair at the landlord’s expense and deduct the resulting claim from rent, or request replacement with a defect-free equivalent under the provision. The statutory sequence matters; the article does not give an unlimited right to commission any work and send the bill to the owner.

The repair request should describe the necessary work sufficiently for a response and allow a period appropriate to the defect. Record the technical information supporting urgency and the proposed solution. The scope and cost of the work should be connected to remedying the defect. A tenant’s preferred improvement or redesign should not be treated as necessary repair merely because it is carried out at the same time.

Preserve quotations, instructions, invoices, payment evidence and the post-work condition. If the parties agree that the landlord will appoint the contractor, record the arrangements and the agreed access. If the tenant relies on the statutory repair-and-deduction route, the file must establish its conditions and the resulting claim. A disputed repair cost should not be entered as an unexplained reduction in the rent ledger.

Article 306 also gives the landlord defined replacement options. The landlord can replace the defective premises with a defect-free equivalent within an appropriate period instead of repairing them. By immediately providing an equivalent free of defects and compensating the tenant’s entire loss, the landlord can prevent exercise of the tenant’s elective rights under the final paragraph. A proposal for different accommodation must therefore be assessed for equivalence, timing and the required compensation, rather than treated as sufficient merely because another address is offered.

Separate ordinary upkeep from the landlord’s defect obligations

Article 317 places ordinary cleaning and maintenance expenses needed for normal use on the tenant, with local custom also considered. This must be read alongside Article 301’s delivery and maintenance obligation. The legal allocation depends on the nature of the task and the contractual framework. Labelling every expense “maintenance” does not establish that it belongs to the tenant.

Identify the cause and scope of the work before allocating its cost. Ordinary use, a pre-existing malfunction, deterioration affecting agreed suitability and damage caused by a party can raise different questions. The condition report should explain what failed and what repair is required. An invoice describing only a general service call may be insufficient to distinguish those issues.

The parties should also distinguish the remedy for a defect from compensation for a separate damaging act. A tenant seeking repair does not thereby admit responsibility for the underlying problem. A landlord paying for urgent work does not necessarily concede every additional damages claim. Record the facts and any express agreement accurately, without reading unstated conclusions into a practical arrangement.

Rent reduction is proportionate and tied to the actual affected period

Article 307 permits a reduction proportionate to defects affecting use for the period from the landlord’s knowledge until the defect is remedied. The claim therefore needs evidence of both extent and time. Identify what use was lost or impaired, the relevant dates and any change following partial repairs. A flat percentage selected without explanation does not establish the statutory proportion.

A defect does not automatically authorise the tenant to stop every payment indefinitely. Distinguish a claimed reduction, a repair-cost deduction under Article 306 and the rent balance otherwise due. Keep a ledger showing the contractual amount, payments, adjustments claimed and the basis of each adjustment. This makes the financial disagreement reviewable and avoids concealing an unrelated arrears issue.

Article 315 separately addresses non-payment of due rent or ancillary expenses and the landlord’s notice route, including a minimum thirty-day period for residential and roofed-workplace leases. A tenant should therefore obtain advice before treating a disputed defect as a complete answer to every demand. The defect remedies and the consequences of an unpaid balance must be analysed together using the actual notices and payment record.

Serious interference with the agreed use can support termination

Article 306 allows termination where the defect removes suitability for the intended use or substantially obstructs it and is not remedied within the period given. This is a stated legal threshold. Explain the interference with the agreed residential use and the failure of the repair process. Disagreement over a minor preference should not be described as meeting that threshold without supporting facts.

The termination communication should identify the contractual relationship, defect, prior demand and legal ground relied on. A tenant’s departure and a legally effective termination are different events. Record the return arrangements and preserve evidence concerning keys, possession and outstanding property. The legal position should not depend on an undocumented assumption that the landlord understood the tenant would never return.

Article 304’s additional route for significant defects at delivery must also be considered where that is the actual situation. Selecting a remedy requires a coherent legal basis; do not combine incompatible descriptions of the same facts merely to demand every possible result. The notice and claim should explain which statutory route is being exercised and what financial consequences are sought.

Article 308 addresses loss and the landlord’s absence-of-fault defence

Article 308 requires the landlord to compensate losses caused by the defective premises unless the landlord proves absence of fault. The tenant must still identify the loss and its connection to the defect. Record the actual expenditure or other financial consequence, its date and supporting document. A requested sum should not be based solely on the inconvenience the tenant describes.

Separate the claimed components. Repair costs, a proportionate rent adjustment and additional expenditure can overlap if entered carelessly. Explain which legal consequence each item represents and account for money already reimbursed. A payment made by the landlord or another source should be identified so the claim does not seek the same loss twice under different headings.

Keep the landlord’s response and explanation in the evidence file. A damages dispute can concern cause, fault, the reasonableness of the expenditure or the amount, even where the physical defect is acknowledged. The analysis should state what is agreed and what remains contested. This makes a negotiated resolution or judicial assessment more precise than an undifferentiated demand for all costs.

Necessary repair access must respect both parties’ statutory duties

Article 319 requires the tenant to tolerate work directed to remedying defects or preventing damage. It also requires the landlord to give suitable advance notice and consider the tenant’s interests. The landlord-entry guide explains that access framework. A defect complaint should be accompanied by workable arrangements for investigation and repair.

Record proposed appointments, the persons attending and the work intended. If an appointment is unsuitable, communicate the reason and a practical alternative. An access disagreement should be documented rather than reduced to accusations that one party refused all cooperation. The court needs to understand what opportunity for repair was actually provided and whether the arrangements respected the statutory duties.

Article 319 preserves the tenant’s rent-reduction and damages rights. Allowing repair access does not automatically settle those claims. Conversely, a pending money dispute does not eliminate the duty to tolerate necessary work under the provision. Keep access, repair completion and financial resolution as separately recorded issues so one practical agreement is not misrepresented as disposing of them all.

Preserve evidence and follow the applicable rental-dispute procedure

Photographs, dated reports, contractor records and complete communications can establish the condition and its development. Where the defect is likely to be repaired or change before trial, assess the lawful evidence-preservation route with counsel. The purpose is to record relevant facts while they remain observable. A technical report should identify its inspection date, methodology and limitations rather than make unsupported legal conclusions.

Law No. 6325 Article 18/B requires an application to mediation before bringing a lawsuit arising from a rental relationship, subject to its stated exception for eviction through enforcement without a judgment under Law No. 2004. The intended claim must be classified correctly. A defect-related repair, reduction or compensation dispute should not bypass the applicable pre-action requirement simply because the tenant is abroad.

Prepare the mediation or litigation account around the defect, knowledge date, repair request, response, affected period and requested financial result. Provide the final procedural records required for any subsequent lawsuit. A discussion with the landlord outside the statutory process and completion of the applicable mediation requirement are different matters. Preserve the actual documents showing which step has occurred.

Close the repair or departure file with verified facts

After repair, record whether the premises are again suitable for the agreed use and which defects remain. Identify the completion date and preserve the contractor’s record and any appropriate inspection. This date can affect the period claimed for rent reduction. An appointment marked complete in a service system should not replace evidence of the work and its result where those facts are disputed.

If the tenancy ends, separate the final rent account, agreed adjustments, repair claims and deposit issue. The rental-deposit guide addresses that distinct financial stage. A deposit should not be treated as an unexplained balancing figure that automatically settles every disagreement. The parties need an itemised account and evidence of any payment or deduction accepted.

The tenant’s strongest file connects the agreed use to the observed defect and then to the specific remedy the Code provides. Prompt notice, a documented opportunity to repair, proportionate calculations and accurate records of access and payment make that connection clear. They also allow the landlord to address the actual problem without either party assuming that inconvenience alone determines the legal outcome.

Frequently asked questions

What must the landlord provide under Article 301?

Premises suitable for the agreed use at delivery and throughout the lease; the residential rule cannot be changed to the tenant’s detriment.

Does every defect justify termination?

No. The serious-defect and repair-period conditions of the applicable provisions must be established.

Must I tell the landlord about the problem?

Article 318 requires prompt notice of defects the tenant is not responsible for remedying.

When does the Article 307 reduction period begin?

The article refers to the landlord learning of the use-affecting defect and runs until the defect is remedied.

Can I select any rent-reduction percentage?

The reduction must be proportionate to the defect and supported by the affected use and period.

Can I commission work and deduct it immediately?

Article 306 provides a defined repair-request and failure-to-remedy sequence. Its conditions and the resulting claim require evidence.

Who pays ordinary cleaning and upkeep?

Article 317 allocates ordinary cleaning and maintenance needed for normal use to the tenant, with local custom considered.

Does allowing repairs waive my financial claims?

Article 319 preserves rent-reduction and damages rights; an access agreement does not itself settle them.

Is mediation relevant before a rental lawsuit?

Yes. Article 18/B of Law No. 6325 imposes the stated pre-action mediation requirement for rental disputes, with its specific enforcement-eviction exception.

What should I keep after leaving?

Retain the termination and handover evidence, final rent account, defect and repair records, deposit documents and proof of payments.