Sea Cargo Claims in Turkey: The One-Year Time Bar, Recourse and Time Extensions
A sea-cargo claim can be lost while the parties are still exchanging invoices, survey reports and settlement proposals. Article 1188 of the Turkish Commercial Code imposes a one-year period for taking judicial action on compensation claims against the carrier for loss, damage or late delivery. It also contains a separate ninety-day recourse rule and permits an agreement extending the period after the cause of action has arisen. Article 1189 addresses conduct which causes a claimant to miss the deadline; ordinary negotiation should not be treated as that exception without evidence.
Have a general question about this article? Ask anonymously
This guide is for overseas cargo interests, carriers and insurers managing a Turkey-linked dispute. It distinguishes the court or arbitration work needed to preserve a claim from operational notice, insurance handling and informal negotiation. The principal sources are Turkish Commercial Code No. 6102 and Mediation Law No. 6325. The Turkish statutory text controls, and the governing law and agreed forum must be established before applying a deadline to an international shipment.
1. Identify the claim before choosing its deadline
Article 1188 concerns compensation claims against the carrier for cargo loss, damage or late delivery. A freight invoice, a seller’s unpaid purchase price, a cargo insurer’s policy obligation and a claim arising from a different service are not automatically the same claim. A common shipment reference does not establish that every participant and every debt shares one period.
Begin with a claim map: who seeks payment, from whom, for which loss and under which relationship? Identify whether the claimant is the original cargo interest, a transferee, a person exercising recourse or an insurer relying on transferred rights. Do not assign a new time period solely because a different company is now handling the documents.
The bill and booking terms also need a governing-law and forum review. The MÖHUK Article 29 international-carriage guide addresses the applicable-law enquiry. A Turkish destination or local shipping agent does not, alone, establish that Turkish time-bar rules govern every aspect of the dispute.
2. Article 1188 is a rights-extinguishing period
The Code describes Article 1188 as a hak düşürücü süre. Its first paragraph states that the compensation right falls away if judicial recourse is not taken within one year. It should not be explained as though a claimant can always preserve it by sending another demand, obtaining an invoice acknowledgement or keeping an insurance file open.
The required procedural step depends on the competent forum and the dispute-resolution agreement. Where arbitration is relevant, identify the applicable commencement rules and the effective step required under them. Do not assume that sending an informal “arbitration warning” or starting an unrelated action necessarily preserves the cargo claim.
A practical deadline record should therefore contain both a date and an action: the legal basis for the date, the relevant defendant, the forum and the filing or commencement step. An entry saying only “claim deadline next year” is not enough to manage a cross-border case where representation, documents and procedural prerequisites must also be arranged.
3. Delivery, partial delivery and non-delivery have specified starting points
Under Article 1188(2), the period begins when the carrier delivers the goods or part of them. Where none of the goods is delivered, it begins when delivery should have occurred. The wording concerning partial delivery is important: do not assume that the clock waits indefinitely for the final missing package or container.
Identify the legal delivery event from the actual records. Vessel arrival, discharge, a terminal release message and receipt by the consignee can occur on different dates. Preserve the delivery receipt, container movement information, custody records and relevant contract terms so the starting point is assessed rather than guessed.
For a non-delivery claim, retain the agreed delivery arrangement and evidence relevant to when performance was due. The date on which an internal claim handler finally closes a tracing enquiry is not automatically the statutory starting point. Likewise, a late survey or a later valuation does not, merely by occurring later, reset the period.
4. A notice of damage is not the same as proceedings
Article 1185 contains distinct notice requirements for cargo loss, damage and delay. The sea-cargo notice and joint-survey guide addresses those requirements. Giving the relevant notice does not mean that Article 1188’s separate proceedings period no longer matters.
Keep a record of each notice and its purpose. A reservation on delivery, an expert’s request to inspect, a financial demand and a formal procedural filing perform different functions. Their dates should appear separately in the chronology rather than being grouped under a single entry labelled “claim submitted.”
The same distinction applies to insurer handling. Notifying a cargo insurer and receiving a claim number does not establish that the carrier has been sued or that a valid extension has been obtained. The insured, insurer and appointed representatives should know who is responsible for preserving the external claim and which documents prove that action.
5. A post-event extension must be an agreement, not an assumption
Article 1188(4) permits extension of the period by an agreement made after the cause of action arises. The timing requirement distinguishes this provision from a generic clause printed before the shipment. The agreement should be tied to the actual claim and parties whose position is being extended.
In practice, record the transport document, relevant claimant and defendant, scope of the extension and the agreed endpoint. Clarify whether the extension concerns a particular claim, several identified bills or a defined recourse relationship. These are drafting precautions, not a statutory requirement that every extension use one prescribed template.
Check the authority of the person giving the extension. An operational agent’s willingness to keep corresponding is not necessarily an agreement by the relevant carrier to extend the period. Retain the request, acceptance and any conditions. Do not describe silence, a promise to investigate or an unanswered proposed extension as a completed agreement.
6. The recourse rule is not an extra ninety days for every cargo claimant
Article 1188(3) allows the person held responsible to bring a recourse action after the primary one-year period has expired. That right must be exercised within ninety days from payment of the compensation sought or service of the claim petition in the compensation action brought against that person. The paragraph addresses the recourse position, not an automatic extension of the original cargo owner’s claim.
Identify the event actually relied upon. Keep proof of payment, the served claim petition and the service record. A commercial warning that a claim may be brought is not necessarily the service event described by the statute. Conversely, a person who has been served should not assume that it can safely wait until a later judgment or payment before considering recourse.
Map the upstream and downstream relationships separately. A contracting carrier’s claim against a performing carrier, an intermediary’s recovery claim and an insurer’s exercise of transferred rights should not be treated as identical merely because all are described informally as “recourse.” Establish that the claimant and claim fall within the provision before using its special period.
7. Misleading delay requires proof that the conduct caused the deadline to be missed
Article 1189 prevents the recipient of a compensation claim from relying on expiry where it kept the injured party waiting in a manner causing that party to miss the time for bringing proceedings. In that situation, the period starts when the injured party learns of the circumstances. The causal requirement is central to the rule.
Preserve the actual representations and chronology. Identify who said what, in which capacity, before which deadline, and how that conduct affected the decision not to take proceedings. A claim that negotiations were lengthy is not a substitute for explaining why the statutory conditions are satisfied.
Do not make Article 1189 the normal deadline-management strategy. It is an argument requiring evidence after a serious problem has occurred, not a guarantee that every invitation to settle restarts time. A documented extension or timely procedural step should be assessed before relying on a disputed allegation of having been lulled into delay.
8. Unclear carrier identity has a separate statutory consequence
Article 1238(4) provides a specific rule where the carrier’s identity is wrongly or belatedly communicated in the circumstances it covers: the Article 1188 period for claims against the carrier does not start until the required name or trade name and principal place of business are correctly supplied. This is not the same issue as ordinary settlement correspondence under Article 1189.
The carrier-identification guide explains the bill, shipowner and representative framework. Keep the unclear document, express identification request, supporting response and relevant dates. A general enquiry to an unrelated intermediary does not automatically establish the conditions of Article 1238.
Even where identity is disputed, continue the factual investigation and forum analysis. Do not assume that every potential defendant benefits from the same starting rule or that uncertainty over one company suspends every other claim. The legal person, document and particular demand must remain identifiable.
9. Mandatory commercial mediation affects the calculation where it applies
A Turkish commercial money claim falling within Article 5/A of the Commercial Code must be assessed for the mandatory pre-action mediation requirement. A cargo-claim timetable should not ignore that procedural stage. The claimant must establish the applicable route rather than filing a generic demand and assuming it satisfies the requirement.
Article 18/A(15) of Mediation Law No. 6325 provides that limitation is suspended and rights-extinguishing periods do not run between application to the mediation bureau and preparation of the final record. Keep the application record and final record with the deadline calculation. This statutory protection should not be confused with informal direct negotiations between the commercial parties.
The effect is not an automatic fresh one-year period after unsuccessful mediation. The excluded interval and the remaining time must be calculated from the relevant starting point and actual documents. Nor should an application made after a right has already fallen away be assumed to revive it. The timing, parties and dispute covered by the application need careful review.
10. Arbitration and other exceptions prevent a one-size-fits-all mediation route
Article 18/A(18) excludes the mandatory-mediation provisions where a special law requires arbitration or another alternative dispute-resolution method, or where an arbitration agreement exists. The validity and application of that agreement must be examined. A clause merely mentioned in correspondence should not be assumed to determine the result without reading the complete contractual documents.
For a bill referring to charterparty terms, the charterparty-incorporation guide explains the separate documentary enquiry. Incorporation, arbitration consent and procedural commencement are related but distinct questions. A conclusion on one should not silently replace analysis of the others.
Urgent protective measures also need their own procedural timetable. Do not treat obtaining security, requesting preservation of evidence or making a mediation application as universally equivalent to commencing the merits claim. Identify which step protects which right, and retain the records proving each step.
11. Use a claim-specific deadline register
| Item | Document to retain | Question answered |
|---|---|---|
| Starting event | Full or partial delivery record, or evidence of the due delivery date | When does Article 1188(2) start the period? |
| Claimant and defendant | Transport document, transfers and carrier identification | Whose claim is being preserved against whom? |
| Extension | Post-cause agreement and authority record | Was the period actually extended? |
| Recourse | Payment or service evidence and the underlying claim | Does Article 1188(3) apply? |
| Mediation | Bureau application and final record | Which statutory interval is excluded? |
| Proceedings | Effective court or arbitration commencement record | Was the required procedural step taken? |
The register should distinguish confirmed dates from contested ones. Where delivery is disputed, retain both the competing evidence and the calculation used for protective action. A deadline should not be deferred merely because the parties disagree about an event which can be assessed conservatively while the dispute is investigated.
Keep a separate note of who is instructed to act and when authority was provided. An internal email asking a broker to “handle the claim” does not establish that a lawyer has been instructed to commence proceedings in the correct forum. Clear responsibility is particularly important where the cargo owner, insurer and several intermediaries are in different countries.
12. Instructions from an overseas cargo interest
Provide the complete transport document, relevant contract terms, delivery records, notices, any extension, and the current stage of mediation or proceedings. Include the served papers rather than a summary that someone “has sued.” Record dates and time zones accurately and identify any imminent date at the start of the enquiry.
Bakırcı & Keskin Law Office is Mersin-based and works throughout Türkiye with an Istanbul and Mersin focus. A confidential document review can be arranged after an initial non-sensitive outline. An enquiry does not establish representation, extend time or replace a necessary filing; urgent deadlines must be addressed through a confirmed procedural instruction.
Frequently asked questions
Does sending a compensation demand preserve the one-year cargo claim indefinitely?
No. Article 1188 concerns judicial recourse within the statutory period. Notice, negotiation and insurance handling are separate from the required proceedings step.
What starts the period where only part of the goods was delivered?
Article 1188(2) expressly includes delivery of part of the goods. Do not assume that the clock necessarily waits for the last missing item.
Can the period be extended by agreement?
Article 1188(4) permits an agreement made after the cause of action arises. Identify the parties, authority, claim covered and agreed endpoint.
Does silence in response to an extension request count as an agreement?
Do not assume that silence or a promise to investigate establishes the required agreement. Retain the actual acceptance and assess its scope and authority.
Does every cargo claimant receive an additional ninety days?
No. Article 1188(3) addresses a qualifying recourse action by the person held responsible, with the payment or service triggers specified there.
Do settlement talks automatically restart time under Article 1189?
No. The provision requires conduct which caused the injured party to miss the proceedings deadline. The representations, causal link and discovery date require evidence.
What is the effect of mandatory mediation on the period?
Where applicable, Article 18/A(15) of Law No. 6325 excludes the interval from bureau application to the final record from the running of rights-extinguishing periods. Preserve both records.
Does unsuccessful mediation automatically give a fresh year?
No. The protected interval and remaining period must be calculated. The rule should not be treated as an automatic restart or revival of an already expired right.
Is mandatory mediation always required despite an arbitration agreement?
Article 18/A(18) provides an exception for the circumstances it identifies, including an arbitration agreement. The agreement’s validity and application must be assessed.
Which document should be sent first when a deadline is close?
Send the complete transport document and the records establishing delivery, any extension, mediation and served proceedings, through a confidential channel. Identify the urgent date clearly.
Primary legal sources
Turkish Commercial Code No. 6102, particularly Articles 5/A, 1188–1189 and 1238; and Mediation Law No. 6325, Article 18/A(15) and (18), hosted by the Ministry of Justice. The Ministry’s Commercial Code reproduction is supplementary and is not presented as a separately certified 2026 consolidation.
Ask about preserving a Turkey-linked cargo claim
State the delivery or due-delivery date, current claim stage and any imminent procedural date. Do not wait for an enquiry response where a necessary filing is already urgent.
Istanbul and Mersin offices
Mersin-based legal work throughout Türkiye, with an Istanbul and Mersin focus.
Istanbul — Polaris Plaza
Maslak Ahi Evran Caddesi, Polaris Plaza No:21, Floor 9, 34475 Sarıyer/İstanbul. Istanbul office directions.
Mersin — Profit İş Merkezi
İhsaniye Mahallesi, 4903. Sokak, Profit İş Merkezi No:23, Floor 3, Office 14, 33070 Akdeniz/Mersin. Mersin office directions.
Call +90 552 224 43 66. An enquiry does not establish representation or suspend a legal deadline.
Contact regarding a legal matter
In your first message, you may briefly state the subject, your country or city, and any relevant notification or recent procedural date. Please do not send identity numbers, medical data, or personal documents. Messaging alone does not constitute legal advice or create a lawyer–client relationship.
Discover more from Bakırcı & Keskin Hukuk Bürosu
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.