Vessel Repairs During a Voyage: Can You Recover Your Cargo and Stop Freight Charges in Turkey?
A vessel entering repair during a voyage does not automatically cancel the freight contract or entitle the cargo interest to remove the goods without addressing freight. Article 1221 of the Turkish Commercial Code permits waiting for completion or taking the goods from the vessel under its payment or security conditions. It separately excludes the repair period from time-based freight and contains a specific rule for goods unloaded during repair under part-voyage charters and contracts for carriage of identified goods. Those rules must be distinguished from temporary unloading during a prolonged unforeseen delay under Article 1222.
Have a general question about this article? Ask anonymously
This guide addresses Turkey-linked shipments for overseas cargo owners, charterers, importers and insurers. Its purpose is to separate the available cargo choices, their financial conditions and any independent damages claim. The main source is Turkish Commercial Code No. 6102, Articles 1221–1222. The applicable law, type of freight contract, documentary entitlement and actual repair circumstances must be established before giving an instruction to remove cargo.
1. Confirm the repair situation and the carriage arrangement
Article 1221 addresses a vessel requiring repair during the voyage. Establish when the voyage began, when the repair need arose, where the vessel is located and whether the goods remain aboard. A pre-loading cancellation, a delay before the voyage and a repair interruption during performance should not be treated as one event.
Obtain the freight agreement, booking records and complete transport document. Identify whether the arrangement is a voyage charter, a part-voyage charter or carriage of identified goods, commonly described in Turkish law as a kırkambar contract. The statutory distinction matters to paragraph 3 and to the temporary-unloading rules.
Record the carrier’s explanation and its evidential status. A confirmed repair notice, an estimated completion date and a preliminary operational message are different records. Preserve later updates without replacing the original chronology, so the parties can establish what was known when a particular cargo decision was made.
2. Waiting and taking the goods are distinct statutory choices
Article 1221(1) allows the goods to be taken from the vessel provided the whole freight and all other claims of the carrier accrued by that point are paid or secured. Alternatively, completion of the repairs can be awaited. The provision does not describe removal as a free cancellation simply because the interruption is inconvenient.
Identify the practical and documentary requirements for each choice. Waiting requires a clear understanding of cargo preservation, the expected repair sequence and continued performance. Removing the goods requires assessment of the statutory financial conditions and the person entitled to instruct or receive the cargo.
Do not treat an enquiry about unloading as an automatically completed election to terminate all contractual relationships. Communications should state whether information is being requested, a removal right is being invoked, temporary unloading is proposed or termination is asserted on a separate legal basis. Those positions can have different consequences.
3. The whole freight and other accrued claims must be identified
The wording of Article 1221(1) concerns the whole freight, not automatically a fraction corresponding to the distance already travelled. It also refers to the carrier’s other claims accrued up to the relevant point. An instruction to release cargo should therefore be accompanied by a transparent statement of the sums and legal bases being addressed.
Request an itemised account distinguishing freight, previously paid sums and each additional accrued claim. The fact that the statute requires payment or security does not mean that every amount a carrier inserts into a release invoice is necessarily established. Disputed entitlement, calculation and allocation must remain visible.
The guide to freight demands and cargo retention addresses related payment issues. Keep the removal condition separate from an admission that all claimed charges are valid or a waiver of an independent claim against the carrier.
4. Security is not a universal fixed-percentage deposit
Article 1221(1) permits the relevant claims to be secured as an alternative to payment within that paragraph. It does not prescribe one universal percentage, bank instrument or standard amount for every shipment. The security must be assessed against the claims and the governing arrangement rather than invented from a general commercial habit.
Record the proposed amount, beneficiary, covered claims, duration and conditions for release or enforcement. A security instrument should not unintentionally cover unrelated debts or operate as an unlimited settlement undertaking. Its legal effect should be read separately from the operational permission to move the goods.
Where the parties disagree, identify precisely whether the dispute concerns the existence of a claim, its amount or the adequacy of security. Sending money to an unverified recipient or signing a broad guarantee does not become prudent merely because the cargo is time-sensitive. Verify the legal entity and the authority of the person receiving the undertaking.
5. Part-voyage charters and identified-goods contracts have a specific rule
Article 1221(3) addresses part-voyage charters and kırkambar contracts where the goods have been unloaded during the repair. In that situation, the carriage-contracting party can recover them by paying the whole freight and other claims. The paragraph uses a payment condition; it should not be paraphrased as repeating every option in paragraph 1.
Establish both the contractual category and the factual unloading. A plan to discharge later is not the same as goods already unloaded during repair. The terminal or storage record should identify the goods, location, date and the entity now controlling access.
This distinction also prevents a party from assuming that its cargo can be removed without regard to the position of other cargo interests sharing the voyage. The relevant statutory rule must be selected before a release demand is framed. A general statement that all cargo owners have identical withdrawal rights is inaccurate.
6. The repair period is excluded from time-based freight
Article 1221(1) states that, where freight is agreed on a time basis, the time during which the repair continues is not included in the calculation. Identify the contractual freight basis first. A lump-sum freight and a rate accruing with time are not interchangeable merely because both appear on an invoice.
Preserve evidence of the repair period: commencement, relevant progress and completion records. The invoice calculation should identify the excluded interval and the rate applied outside it. An estimate circulated before work began should not automatically replace the period established by the eventual records.
The statutory rule does not say that every possible terminal, storage or preservation expense disappears during repair. Those charges require their own basis and allocation. Separate the time-freight calculation from other sums so that a valid exclusion is not obscured by unrelated costs or enlarged beyond what the provision states.
7. Loss of the contract’s particular purpose is a separate issue
Article 1221(2) expressly preserves the first sentence of Article 1222(1). That sentence generally leaves the parties’ rights and obligations unchanged where the voyage is delayed before or after commencement by a natural event or another unforeseen circumstance outside the specifically regulated cases, unless the delay has caused the contract’s particular purpose to be lost.
A claim that the particular contractual purpose has disappeared should identify that purpose and the facts showing its loss. General commercial inconvenience and an established purpose of the contract should not be treated as identical. Preserve the accepted terms and communications explaining the function of the agreed performance.
Do not assume that every late shipment automatically justifies termination, or that repair means the parties can never invoke another supported statutory position. The repair rule and the preserved purpose-related qualification must be assessed together on the actual contract and delay evidence.
8. Temporary unloading during a long unforeseen delay is a different mechanism
Article 1222(1) separately permits the carriage-contracting party, in the prolonged unforeseen-delay circumstances described there, to unload goods already aboard against sufficient and appropriate security, at its own risk and expense, on condition that they are reloaded in time. This is not the same as permanently recovering goods under Article 1221.
Where the goods are not reloaded, Article 1222 requires payment of the whole freight and compensation for the loss caused by unloading. A temporary-unloading proposal should therefore identify the custody arrangement, reloading responsibility and relevant timetable rather than merely instruct a terminal to release the cargo.
Article 1222(3) requires the consent of the other carriage-contracting parties for temporary unloading under part-voyage charters and kırkambar contracts. That additional requirement should not be omitted. A single cargo interest’s preferred logistics plan does not automatically establish permission to disrupt a shared carriage arrangement.
9. Public-authority delay and repair time are not interchangeable
Article 1222(2) provides that time-based freight does not run where delay results from an act of public authority. This is a separate statutory ground from the exclusion of the repair period in Article 1221. A file involving both events should identify the relevant intervals and causes instead of labelling the whole interruption as one.
Obtain the authority decision or instruction relied upon and its operative dates. Distinguish a legal restriction from an operational estimate or a carrier’s voluntary scheduling decision. The particular statutory basis should be connected to the period excluded from the calculation.
Where several causes overlap, do not double-count the same excluded day or assume that one label resolves every disputed expense. A clear chronology allows the time-based freight calculation and any other charge to be checked separately against the contract and applicable provision.
10. Cargo entitlement and safety requirements still govern physical release
The right to seek removal under a freight rule does not identify every person entitled to receive cargo under a bill of lading. Establish who holds the relevant documentary rights, whether a financing party is involved and who has authority to give the instruction. The original-bill release guide addresses the separate delivery framework.
Customs, port and safety requirements also need to be satisfied through the appropriate channels. A private payment agreement does not itself constitute customs clearance or permission to interfere with repair operations. Identify the actual custodian and the required release records before arranging movement.
Preserve the goods’ condition at each handover and establish who bears the agreed storage and onward-carriage responsibilities. Where another vessel is proposed, assess the relevant authorisation and carriage arrangements rather than assuming that recovery from the first vessel automatically creates a new transport contract.
11. Choosing removal does not decide an independent damages claim
The reason the vessel required repair can raise a separate responsibility issue. Article 1141 concerns vessel fitness and the specified pre-voyage diligence question, while Article 1178 addresses care during performance and custody. A cargo interest should identify any alleged breach and causal loss separately from the immediate decision to wait or recover the goods.
Payment or security documents should be reviewed for any settlement or release wording. Meeting an operational release condition and agreeing to abandon all claims are different legal acts. A broad receipt, indemnity or settlement should not be signed on the assumption that its effect is limited to obtaining the cargo.
Preserve the relevant notice position and proceedings timetable. Negotiating security or awaiting repairs should not be assumed to suspend every legal period or replace a required procedural step.
12. Prepare a repair, freight and cargo-decision file
| Issue | Evidence to retain | Legal focus |
|---|---|---|
| Repair during the voyage | Departure, repair notice and progress chronology | Article 1221’s factual setting |
| Choice to wait or recover cargo | Clear instruction and documentary authority | Article 1221(1) |
| Payment or security | Whole-freight calculation, accrued claims and proposed instrument | Release conditions and scope |
| Goods already unloaded under a shared carriage | Contract category and unloading record | Article 1221(3) |
| Time-freight exclusion | Rate, repair period and any authority-delay record | Articles 1221(1) and 1222(2) |
| Temporary unloading | Security, reloading plan and required consents | Article 1222(1) and (3) |
For an overseas client, provide a concise outline identifying the Turkish connection, vessel location, cargo status and the decision required. Include the actual freight terms, not only the latest invoice. A confidential review can then distinguish immediate release conditions from disputed responsibility and longer-term recovery.
Frequently asked questions
Does a vessel repair automatically cancel the freight contract?
No. Article 1221 regulates waiting or taking the goods under specified conditions and preserves a separate purpose-related rule. Identify the actual contractual and statutory basis of any termination claim.
What must be addressed to take goods under Article 1221(1)?
The whole freight and the carrier’s other claims accrued up to that point must be paid or secured under the paragraph. The actual sums and entitlement should be identified.
Does the statute prescribe a fixed security percentage?
Article 1221 does not prescribe one universal percentage. Assess the security against the relevant claims and the legal effect of the instrument proposed.
Is the rule for goods already unloaded under a part charter identical?
No. Article 1221(3) specifically addresses part-voyage charters and kırkambar contracts and states payment of the whole freight and other claims as the condition for recovery.
Does time-based freight run during the repair period?
Article 1221(1) excludes the period during which repair continues where freight is agreed on a time basis. Establish the rate and actual period from the records.
Does that exclusion automatically remove all storage charges?
No. The time-freight rule and other expenses require separate legal and contractual analysis. Identify each charge and the party to whom it is allocated.
Is temporary unloading the same as permanently recovering the cargo?
No. Article 1222’s temporary-unloading mechanism includes security, risk and cost allocation, timely reloading and consequences if reloading does not occur.
Are other cargo interests’ consents relevant to temporary unloading?
Yes. Article 1222(3) requires other carriage-contracting parties’ consent for the specified part-charter and kırkambar situations.
Does meeting a release condition automatically settle every damages claim?
Not automatically. Read the actual payment, security and release documents. Operational recovery and a contractual settlement of claims are distinct acts.
What should an overseas cargo interest send first?
The complete freight and transport documents, repair chronology, cargo location, itemised account and proposed release or security terms, together with any urgent legal date.
Primary legal sources
Ministry of Justice legislation record for Law No. 6102; the Ministry’s statutory text, Articles 1221–1222 on PDF pages 243–244, read with the relevant freight, documentary-entitlement and carrier-responsibility provisions. The hosted reproduction is not presented as a separately certified 2026 consolidation. The governing Turkish text and the shipment’s applicable law control.
Ask about cargo held during vessel repairs
State the Turkish connection, vessel and cargo location, repair stage and amount requested for release. Use a non-sensitive outline initially; arrange a confidential channel for the documents.
Istanbul and Mersin offices
Bakırcı & Keskin Law Office is Mersin-based and works throughout Türkiye with an Istanbul and Mersin focus.
Istanbul — Polaris Plaza
Maslak Ahi Evran Caddesi, Polaris Plaza No:21, Floor 9, 34475 Sarıyer/İstanbul. Istanbul office directions.
Mersin — Profit İş Merkezi
İhsaniye Mahallesi, 4903. Sokak, Profit İş Merkezi No:23, Floor 3, Office 14, 33070 Akdeniz/Mersin. Mersin office directions.
Call +90 552 224 43 66. An enquiry does not establish representation or suspend a legal deadline.
Contact regarding a legal matter
In your first message, you may briefly state the subject, your country or city, and any relevant notification or recent procedural date. Please do not send identity numbers, medical data, or personal documents. Messaging alone does not constitute legal advice or create a lawyer–client relationship.
Discover more from Bakırcı & Keskin Hukuk Bürosu
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.